THE REUTERS PHOTO FROM SHERYL SANDBERG’S NON-APOLOGY PRESS EVENT IS LITERALLY ¯\_(ツ)_/¯. pic.twitter.com/YuGKBDe5xG
— Robinson Meyer (@yayitsrob) July 2, 2014
Pretty good/comical tweet, mining ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ for humor that was previously thought depleted.
What...is Disputations?
That "article" only raised further questions.
What's Campfire?
How could one post to it? How can one post to this new thing?
Or is this just for Gawker employees, and irrelevant to us rando users - and if so, why am I seeing it as a rando user?
Edit: Just found an actual article on an actual journalistic publication that explains some actual fucking context. There we go. Now that I know what Disputations is, I understand why they're loath to explain it, but I don't understand why the hell they're doing it.
Well, I looked up campfire but wasn't around when it was confusing you.
everything is the worst
Counterpoint: Everything is awesome!
There is nothing I like about this woman. She sucks.
She's rich... powerful... listen, if you could rescue her, the reward would be... well, more wealth than YOU can imagine.
I CAN IMAGINE PRETTY MUCH
Aw, thanks. I thought I was over ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ too, but the picture was just too good and then suddenly I was typing and off it went.
what is it ?
